Aus-China FTA ag outcomes at a glance

18 Nov, 2014 08:55 AM
Comments
7
 
Tony Abbott and Xi Jinping leave the House of Representatives on Monday. Photo: Andrew Meares
China will account for 43 per cent of all growth world-wide in agricultural demand to 2050
Tony Abbott and Xi Jinping leave the House of Representatives on Monday. Photo: Andrew Meares

CHINA buys more of Australia’s agricultural produce than any other market. In 2013, this market was worth around $9 billion to Australian farmers and the broader agricultural sector.

Trade is growing strongly, but there are opportunities for greater and more profitable trade. The Australian Bureau of Resource Economics and Sciences predicts China will account for 43 per cent of all growth world-wide in agricultural demand to 2050.

The China-Australia free trade agreement (ChAFTA) provides Australia with an advantage over our major agricultural competitors, including the United States, Canada and the European Union.

It also counters the advantages Chile and New Zealand currently enjoy through their FTAs with China reached in 2006 and 2008.

In agriculture and food, the Australian Government has secured:

• The removal of all tariffs on our dairy products (which can be as high as 20 per cent) within four to 11 years.

• The removal of tariffs of 12 to 25pc on beef over nine years.

• The removal of tariffs on live animal exports of 10pc within four years.

• The removal of tariffs on sheepmeat of 12 to 23pc over eight years.

• The removal of tariffs of 14 to 20pc on wine over four years.

• The removal of tariffs on all horticulture products, ranging up to 30pc, most within four years.

• The immediate elimination of the three per cent tariff on barley.

• An Australia-only duty free quota for wool in addition to continued access to China’s World Trade Organisation (WTO) wool quota.

• The removal of tariffs on seafood, including of 15 and 14pc respectively on rock lobster and abalone, over four years.

• The removal of tariffs across a range of processed foods including fruit juice and honey.

• The removal of tariffs of 5 to 14pc on hides, skins and leather over two to seven years.

• The removal of tariffs on all nuts over five years.

There are no changes to Australia’s risk-based quarantine measures as a result of ChAFTA.

As part of joining the WTO in 2001, China already allows generous imports of rice, wheat, cotton and sugar with generally low tariffs imposed within a quota.

Australian exporters have unrestricted access to these allowances (notwithstanding, Australia does not have technical quarantine market access for rice).

China has not provided further liberalisation of these products in any of its FTAs, on the basis they are significantly sensitive staples.

It has also not granted Australia, or any of our competitors, additional access for rapeseed and vegetable oils, on the same basis.

However, China has agreed to a built-in review process three years after entry into force to review the agreement, including market access.

Page:
1
FarmOnline
Date: Newest first | Oldest first

READER COMMENTS

Bushie Bill
19/11/2014 7:44:06 AM

So, why are we not hearing about the great opportunities being served up on a plate to RARA? Is it because RARA and its agsocs now realise they will now have to stop whingeing and actually get on and do all the things that they claim others have been them preventing them from doing? No more excuses to hide behind for a 15 year history of falling productivity.
John NIven
19/11/2014 9:31:31 AM

Dear Bushie Bill, All we have to do is lower our wages and conditions to those of China. I assume you are all for that.
Frank Blunt
19/11/2014 10:15:46 AM

Bushie lower his begging bowl, John? You're kidding.
Qlander
19/11/2014 11:19:19 AM

With until Bushie is working for Chinese wages.... THEN we'll hear some whingeing!
Genazzano
19/11/2014 5:46:44 PM

Bushie does not work !!!!!!!!!!!
FFS
19/11/2014 7:55:37 PM

Is it possible for anyone to whinge any harder than he already does now, Qlander?
Bushie Bill
20/11/2014 12:45:24 PM

Isn't that interesting? The five posts following my opening post are personal attacks on me and none of them address the very logical and very reasonable question I so humbly asked.

POST A COMMENT


Screen name *
Email address *
Remember me?
Comment *
 

COMMENTS

light grey arrow
I've said this before but if farmers are not happy with their CBH Board they should put up or
light grey arrow
I think central wheatbelt is holding CBH responsible for matters way outside of their
light grey arrow
Hey Jock, costs of execution on the East are now at or below the CBH system. You now officially