Fears grow over Labor's tree plan

Fears grow over Labor's tree plan


Farm Online News
Joel Fitzgibbon. Photo Alex Ellinghausen.

Joel Fitzgibbon. Photo Alex Ellinghausen.

Aa

Nats say Labor will tighten land clearing laws to reach its ambitious emissions reduction target

Aa

Labor could force agriculture do the heavy lifting on climate change, despite its pledge to exempt the sector from its ambitious carbon reduction goals, according to federal Agriculture Minister David Littleproud.

The federal opposition is promising to reduce carbon emissions by 45 per cent by 2030 if it wins government on May 18 but has repeatedly said the agriculture sector would be exempt from the reduction target.

At the same time, Labor would use Commonwealth powers to tighten land clearing laws across the country to bring all states into line with the Queensland Labor government's controversial vegetation management regime.

The Opposition has also pledged to create an authority and new laws which would help administer land clearing, establishing an Environment Protection Agency and reforming the Commonwealth Environment Protection Biodiversity Conservative Act.

Responding to Farmonline's questions today, Opposition Agriculture spokesman Joel Fitzgibbon and Climate Change and Energy spokesman Mark Butler could not say how much carbon they forecast would come from their land clearing reforms.

Mr Littleproud accused Labor of imposing a hidden emissions reduction target on agriculture and said the move would restrict the earning capacity of farmers on their private land without compensation.

RELATED READING

"Taking away farmers' rights to manage vegetation on their own land is clearly a major way Labor intends to reduce Australia's carbon output," Mr Littleproud said.

"Land with vegetation on it will be unproductive for farmers yet Labor will give them nothing for it. This is repossession of private property by stealth."

Mr Fitzgibbon said Mr Littleproud either willfully ignored Labor's Carbon Farming Initiative (CFI), or did not understand the policy's potential.

"David Littleproud either doesn't understand Labor's carbon farming policy framework or he's just desperately and deliberately scaremongering," Mr Fitzgibbon said.

The CFI was introduced by the former Labor government in 2011 and rolled into the Abbott government's Emissions Reduction Fund in 2014. It provided funding for emissions reduction on private land through a range of prescribed activities focused on methane capture at landfill and avoided tree clearing.

Mr Littleproud's criticisms of Labor may revive memories the Howard government's Kyoto policy, which relied on agriculture to deliver carbon reductions across all industries.

The then Coalition negotiated concessions in an international treaty that allowed Australia to count its avoided deforestation against the 2012 emissions reduction target.

The impact on agriculture was felt through tighter land clearing regulations for farmers, which added to Australia's 'avoided deforestation' budget under the Kyoto regime and allowed other sectors including energy, transport and resources to increase their emissions.

Labor has committed to invest $40m to the CFI for research and development over four years, which would include a new methodology to issue credits not just for landholders to trap carbon in vegetation growth, but also for ecosystem services such as protecting valuable flora, flora and landscapes.

"Labor will work with farmers and other landholders to improve their soil resources, increase water efficiency and earn income from the carbon economy all at the same time," Mr Fitzgibbon said.

Mr Littleproud has implemented a $30m pilot Agriculture Biodiversity Stewardship Program, which does not include carbon abatement goals, to deliver payments to private land managers who improve the landscape or capture carbon on their property.

The trial will be rolled out in selected regions, across a range of commodities. A methodology to measure outcomes on farmland will be developed in consultation with Australian National University and agricultural stakeholder groups.

The federal government has committed to a more modest emissions reduction target, 26pc by 2030, which is the minimum requirement under the Paris agreement.

The 10 year, $2 billion Climate Solutions Fund is the government's emissions reduction mechanism, which has been criticised by environment groups for its lack of funding.

Aa

From the front page

Sponsored by